Legal Opinion
Frisenda v. Floyd
District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Decided April 5, 2018No. 1:17-cv-00089Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA DAWN FRISENDA, Plaintiff, v. // CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17CV89 (Judge Keeley) LINDSEY FLOYD and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DKT. NO. 19] The defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”), has filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, presenting the question whether West Virginia law requires that it pay a pro rata share of the attorney’s fees and costs incurred by the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- U.S. Airways, Inc. v. McCutchenSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- State Automobile Mutual Insurance v. YoulerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.