Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. John's Administratrix

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 14, 1913PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Shelby .Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Turner

Affirming.

The C. & O. Railway Company under a contract with the L. & N. Railroad Company uses jointly with the latter ■ its railroad tracks running from Lexington to Louisville.

On the afternoon of January 16th,. 1912, a regular L. & N. passenger train bound from Lexington to Louisville, and a special or “dead train” of the C. & O. Railway Company bound from Louisville to Lexington, met in a collision at a point in Shelby county'

The L. & N. train was a regular passenger train, had the right, of track, and was running practically on time, being at the time of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Lovell's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  3. McHenry Coal Co. v. SneddonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  4. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  5. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. MeltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Rowland's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. West Kentucky Coal Co. v. Shoulders' AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  3. City of Pineville v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. Rennewanz v. DeanOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Louisville N. R. Co. v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API