Legal Opinion
Cohen & Co. v. Messina
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 8, 1985No. 48894PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAnn McManamon, J.
On May 17, 1982, plaintiff-appellant, Cohen and Company (“Cohen”), filed an action against defendant-appellee, Anthony J. Messina, to enforce certain client ownership provisions in its personnel manual. 1 Cohen claims that these provisions require Messina to compensate Cohen for clients appellee allegedly took from the firm following his resignation. Appellant subsequently filed an amended complaint which included a claim based on promissory estoppel. The company contends that Messina’s avowed intention to pay for the clients he took estopped him from denying his obligation to make such…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Johnson v. National Beef Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Hedrick v. Center for Comprehensive Alcoholism TreatmentOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Rhoades v. RhoadesOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
- Bretz v. Union Central Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Nilavar v. OsbornOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Manofsky v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Shaw v. J. Pollock & Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Scotts Company, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Central Garden & Pet Company, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Healey v. Republic Powdered Metals, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.