United States v. Gill
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MARSH, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover an alleged balance due on a promissory note executed by defendant and delivered to plaintiff’s predecessor in title, the Reconstruction Finance Corporation. 1
The defendant admits in his answer to the complaint that the note was executed and delivered by him to the Reconstruction Finance Corporation; and further admits the truth of plaintiff’s allegation that defendant has only paid $2,596.20 of the $5,255 face value of the note. However, defendant denies any indebtedness to plaintiff, but to the contrary alleges in a counterclaim…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Toebelman v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Neuman v. Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Associated Hardware Supply Co. v. The Big Wheel Distributing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Dugan v. First Nat'l Bank in WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- Potter's Photographic Applications Co. v. Ealing CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Woodbury v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1961
- Goodman v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.