Legal Opinion

Compton-Gardena Milling Co. v. McCartney

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 20, 1924No. Civ. No. 4126PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment rendered against him on an account for merchandise sold and delivered to the defendant.

Appellant was the owner of a parcel of land on which there was an orchard of fruit trees. The premises also were used,as a poultry farm. Some time during the year 1917 he placed on this farm as manager one Masterson. At the trial of this action it was claimed by appellant that Master-son was there as his tenant. He admits, however, that concerning Masterson’s relation to the ranch “there is a balanced conflict of testimony.” As the trial court, on that conflicting…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Berguin v. Pacific Electric RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Irer v. GawnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Linstead v. StoddardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Kern v. Art Schimkat Construction Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Hughes v. HartmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API