Legal Opinion

Hays County Appraisal District v. Mayo Kirby Springs, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided August 30, 1995No. 03-93-00264-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POWERS, Justice.

Hays County Appraisal District appeals from an adverse judgment in a suit by Mayo Kirby Springs, Inc. for judicial review of a District order fixing, for ad valorem tax purposes, the market value of Mayo’s real property in Hays County. See Tex.Tax Code Ann. §§ 41.21-.43 (West 1992 & Supp.1995) (the “Code”). We will reverse the trial-court judgment and remand the cause for proeeed-ings not inconsistent with our opinion,

THE CONTROVERSY

Mayo’s property is subdivided into residential lots that the company sells as a trade or business. Section 23.12(a) of the Code provides that in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Rogers v. Daniel Oil & Royalty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Swaim v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Aaron Rents, Inc. v. Travis Central Appraisal District, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
  2. Glazer's Wholesale Distributors, Inc. v. Heineken USA, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
  3. Aaron Rents, Inc. v. Travis Central Appraisal District, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
  4. Glazer's Wholesale Distributors, Inc. v. Heineken USA, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API