Glazer's Wholesale Distributors, Inc. v. Heineken USA, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FITZGERALD, Justice.
Glazer’s Wholesale Distributors, Inc. brings an interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s order granting Heineken USA, Inc., Heineken Brouwerijen B.V., and Am-stel Brouwerij B.V.’s motion to compel arbitration. Glazer’s also brings a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that we order the trial court to set aside its order compelling arbitration. This Court consolidated the two cases. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because we *291determine the statute requiring arbitration, as applied in this case, unconstitutionally delegates judicial authority in…
2Cases cited108 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mohamed v. Auto Nation USA Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
- Bates v. MTH Homes-Texas, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
- Collins v. Guinn, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
- Jenkens & Gilchrist v. Riggs, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
- In the Interest of C.P.J.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.