Legal Opinion

Folsom v. Harr

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1905PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Theodore Brentano, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Magruder

The original bill in this case was filed on January 5, 1905, to which a demurrer was sustained. An amended bill was filed on March 13, 1905, to which a demurrer was filed and sustained. A second amended bill was filed on May 22, 1905. A general demurrer was filed to the latter bill, and sustained. The plaintiff elected to stand by his second amended bill, and it was thereupon dismissed for want of equity at complainant’s costs. The present appeal is prosecuted from such decree of dismissal.

The bill alleges that, on September 25, 1902, the appellee, Harr, being the owner in fee of a certain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hayes v. O'BrienIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Fogg v. PriceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Brix v. OttIllinois Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hood v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
  2. King v. Dalton Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. Barling v. HornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  4. Kellner v. BartmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. Wolf v. LodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API