Crown Products Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion
On May 4, 1943 this appeal was argued at length. We had a short while before (April 12, 1943) heard argument on a motion to make the appeal a supersedeas, which we granted, but advanced the date for argument. Because of the importance of the case and the necessity for a prompt decision, we gave it immediate consideration, and on May 6, 1943, entered a formal judgment dismissing the appeal and affirming the order of the Public Utility Commission, stating that an opinion would be prepared and filed later. This opinion is filed pursuant to that statement.
The appeal was from an order of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wilson v. Philadelphia School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Graham v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Bell Telephone Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Carey v. CareySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Kersey v. Sch. River E. S. R., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1890
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.