Legal Opinion

Bell Telephone Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 1939No. Appeal, 190PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Parker, J.,

The question involved in this appeal is whether the Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania is entitled to be reimbursed for a loss it suffered as a result of a change it was compelled to make in the location of its underground conduits in a public street to make way for highway improvements and abolition of grade crossings inaugurated by the County of Allegheny to relieve a congestion in traffic and promote public safety.

The public authorities were confronted with a serious situation occasioned by the density of traffic at the south entrance to the Liberty Tubes in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Butchers' Union Slaughter-House & Live-Stock Landing Co. v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Cryan's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Scranton Gas & Water Co. v. Scranton CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  5. Rafferty v. Central Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Delaware River Port Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. State Ex Rel. Rich v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company v. WentzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Delaware River Joint Commission CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API