Legal Opinion

Weinstein v. E. F. Hutton & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1990No. B042651PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ASHBY, J.

Plaintiffs and appellants Sanford M. Weinstein and others sued defendants and respondents E. F. Hutton & Co., Inc., and others to recover investment losses, asserting various theories of fraud, misrepresentation, negligence and breach of fiduciary duty. After a three-day nonjury trial, the court entered judgment in favor of respondents. Appellants appealed that judgment, but then discovered that the reporter’s transcript on appeal could not be completed because the reporter’s notes of the first day of trial were lost.

Appellants moved the trial court to grant a new trial under…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. GzikowskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Hennigan v. United Pacific InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Norris v. NorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Conlin v. CoyneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Western States Construction Co. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. MarcroftAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1992
  2. Domus IV Investors, LLC v. WangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API