State v. Ross
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.
Defendant petitions for reconsideration of our disposition of this case. State v. Ross, 199 Or App 1, 110 P3d 630 (2005). We allow the petition and modify our disposition.
In our previous opinion we held that the trial court erred in sentencing defendant to pay the costs of his court-appointed attorney because it faded to make findings concerning his current ability to pay. Ross, 199 Or App at 14-15. We affirmed on all other assignments of error. Our disposition read: “Remanded for resentencing as to costs of court-appointed counsel; otherwise affirmed.” In his petition, defendant argues that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. EdsonOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Carey-MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State v. FlajoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- State v. AshleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. AshleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011