Legal Opinion
Cavalry Investments v. Dzilinski, 88769 (7-26-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 26, 2007No. 88769PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants, Christine and Timothy Dzilinski (the Dzilinskis), appeal the trial court's denial of their motion to vacate. Finding no merit to the appeal, we affirm.
{¶ 2} The record reflects that the Dzilinskis had a credit card with Chase Manhattan Bank. In 1999, Chase sold and transferred the account to plaintiff-appellee, Cavalry Investments, LLC ("Cavalry"). In 2005, Cavalry filed a complaint against the Dzilinskis for the unpaid credit card balance. The Dzilinskis filed a counterclaim challenging Cavalry's collection practices. The matter proceeded…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Griffey v. RajanOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Kay v. Marc Glassman, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cuyahoga Cty. Treasurer v. LaRossa Property Affiliates, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025
- Thrower v. BoldenOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Benesch v. Action Software, Inc., 91708 (4-2-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re R.J.G.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017