Legal Opinion
Tello v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 1, 2005No. 03-12545PublishedCited by 113 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIRCH, Circuit Judge:
This interlocutory appeal presents the issue of whether the amended statute of limitations in the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002, known as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“SOA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1658(b), revives securities fraud actions that were time-barred before the effective date of the SOA. Determining that the new limitations period revives actions that previously were time-barred, the district judge denied the motion to dismiss. We VACATE the district court’s order and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I.…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- Russell Dusek v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Secretary of Labor v. South Florida ContractorsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Center for Biological Diversity v. Sam HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Betz v. Trainer Wortham & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Arthur v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.