McKay v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
STEVENS, Judge.
The Workmen’s Compensation matter now under consideration involves the application of “the going and coming rule”.
Betty Hult McKay, wife of Roy McKay, was the President and principal stockholder of the employer corporation, Betty Hult Shops, Inc. Her daughter Ann Hult was an officer of the corporation and together Mrs. McKay and her daughter were the principal employees of the employer corporation. The place of business of the corporation was in Tucson. Mrs. McKay and her daughter lived together in a home in Tucson approximately IS miles from the corporate place of business.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Director of InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Butler v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Clawson v. . Pierce-Arrow Motor Car Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- McCampbell v. Benevolent & Protective Order of ElksArizona Supreme Court · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Malinski v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Myers v. ReebCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Malinski v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967