Legal Opinion

Postler v. Travelers Ins. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1916No. S. F. No. 6947PublishedCited by 28 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

The plaintiff, wife of Gustave Postler, was the beneficiary named in two policies of accident insurance issued by the defendant to said Postler. By each of the policies Postler was insured in the principal sum of one thousand dollars “against bodily injuries effected directly and independently of all other causes through external, violent, and accidental means (suicide, whether sane or insane, is not covered).” The complaint alleged that on the twenty-seventh day of January, 1911, said Gustave Postler “received a bodily injury through external, violent and accidental means . . . to wit, by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Western Commercial Travelers' Ass'n v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  2. Rock v. Travelers' Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Hutton v. States Accident InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Taliaferro v. Travelers' Protective Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
  5. Jenkin v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Zuckerman v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Olinsky v. Railway Mail Assn.California Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Poncino v. Sierra Nevada Life & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Witherow v. United American InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API