Legal Opinion
Ellis v. Mullin
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 10, 2002No. 01-6004PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Appellee’s petition for rehearing is denied.1
*1124The suggestion for rehearing en banc was transmitted to all of the judges of the court who are in regular active service. A poll was requested and a majority of the active judges voted to deny rehearing en banc.2
The panel opinion, filed December 10, 2002 [312 F.3d 1201], is hereby modified in the following regards:
On page 10, [312 F.3d at 1206], the last sentence of first paragraph has been deleted (“However, the state court’s determination ... State court proceeding”). Inserted in its place, Le v. Mullin, 311 F.3d 1002, 1010 (10th Cir.2002).
On…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ford v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cooper v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Weeks v. AngeloneSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Nicole Harris v. Sheryl ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Patton v. MullinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Primeaux v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
- TRYON v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018
- Harris v. PoppellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.