Legal Opinion
Carroll v. Daigle
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 13, 1983No. 82-382PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The plaintiffs appeal from the Superior Court’s (Souter, J.) approval of a Master’s (Gary R. Cassavechia, Esq.) recommendation that their petition for declaratory judgment relating to an option to repurchase realty be dismissed. We affirm.
The case was submitted on an agreed statement of facts. The plaintiffs, Daniel H. and Mary Carroll, purchased a home in Somersworth in 1955. In 1975, the plaintiffs fell behind in their mortgage payments, and the Farmers Home Administration (FHA) instituted foreclosure proceedings on the property. To avoid foreclosure, the plaintiffs entered into an…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cornwell v. CornwellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- Fletcher v. FrisbeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Wanous v. BalacoIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
- Spaulding v. Yovino-YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Derouin v. Granite State Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Peter-Michael, Inc. v. Sea Shell AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Smyth v. Berman, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Mark A. Marcucci v. Marion J. Hardy, Mark A. Marcucci v. Marion J. HardyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Higgins v. HigginsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- Kutkowski v. Princeville Prince Golf Course, LLCHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.