Legal Opinion

Phillips v. First Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 2, 1922No. 6 Div. 712PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

Under our statute ■{section 2597, Code 1907), funeral expenses are made the first preferred claim against the assets of a decedent’s estate.

But, independent of any statute—

“Funeral expenses, says Lord Coke, according to the degree, and quality of the deceased, at common law were allowed of the goods of the deceased, before, any debt or duty whatever, and his burial was the first duty of an executor. If there was no executor, or if he was unknown, or not at hand, a friend or a stranger may attend to the duty, and bury the deceased in a manner suitable to the estate he leaves behind him; and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Patterson v. . PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Jackson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  3. Hildebrand v. KinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Gayle's Adm'r v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  5. Sweeney v. MuldoonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. In Re Estate of MacFarlineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  3. Fuerst v. EichbergerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Page v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Wright v. MenefeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API