Fuerst v. Eichberger
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The suit was to set aside a conveyance alleged to be fraudulent and to defeat a creditor who had judgment under the written award of arbitrators.
The subject of arbitration and awards under the statute and the common law are considered in section 6156 et seq., Code; Rhodes v. Folmar, 208 Ala. 593, 94 So. 745; Gardner v. Newman, 135 Ala. 522, 33 So. 179; Hoffman v. Milner, 142 Ala. 678, 38 So. 758; Wilbourn v. Hurt, 139 Ala. 557, 36 So. 768.
The concrete question for decision is thus stated by appellants’ counsel: “Both parties admit that all the proceedings in this arbitration up to and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bernhardt v. CurtisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
- Odum v. Rutledge & Julian RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Byrd v. OdemSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
- Phillips v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Black v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Southern Energy Homes, Inc. v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
- Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. v. HoneaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- Alafabco, Inc. v. Citizens BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Honea v. Raymond James Fin. Servs., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.