Legal Opinion

Estate of Detjen v. Friedmann

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1967PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The controlling questions on this appeal are whether the claimants met the burden of proof to sustain their claim against the estate for reimbursement of their payments of medical, pharmaceutical, hospital, and other expenses on behalf of the deceased and whether the evidence supports the finding of a completed gift of the bank account by the decedent.

Edith Detjen lived with the claimant Ann Friedmann for some twenty-eight years prior to her death. Ann Friedmann and the decedent’s son Roy were married in 1931 but were divorced in Texas in 1933. She returned to Wauwatosa and commenced living…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Opitz v. KarelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Wojahn v. National Union Bank of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Estate of St. GermainWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Madison Trust Co. v. SkogstromWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Baltes v. KliefWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Matter of Estate of SteffesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Milwaukee County v. WaltherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Peters v. Peters Auto Sales, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Schreiber v. Kellogg-Citizens National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Kenosha County Department of Social Services v. Kenosha National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API