Legal Opinion

Gold East Paper (Jiangsu) Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 2, 2014No. Consol. 10-00371ErrataCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MUSGRAVE, Senior Judge:

This opinion addresses the Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (“Redetermination ”) that concern the antidumping duty investigation on Certain Coated Paper from the PRC (“Final Determination”). 1 Familiarity with the prior opinion on the case, 38 CIT -, 918 F.Supp.2d 1317 (2013), is here presumed.

Pursuant to the order of remand, the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) undertook to (1) calculate the value of certain inputs using only market economy purchase prices, (2) use the purchase prices…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Rhone Poulenc, Inc. And Rhone Poulenc Chimie De Base, S.A. v. The United States, Pq CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Svetlana Galina and Viatcheslav Galin v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gold East Paper (Jiangsu) Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
  2. Gold East Paper (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
  3. Best Mattresses Int'l Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2024
  4. Best Mattresses Int'l Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API