Legal Opinion

O'Hara v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 5, 2012No. 10SC386PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marquez

{1 In this case, we interpret Colorado's wiretapping statute, which permits a judge to issue an ex parte order approving a wiretap only "upon application of the attorney general or a district attorney." § 16-15-102(1)(a), C.R.S. (2006). Defendant-Petitioner, Thomas Lynn O'Hara, III, was convicted of distribution of a schedule II controlled substance, adjudicated a habitual criminal, and sentenced to ninety-six years in the Department of Corrections. Prior to trial, O'Hara moved unsuccessfully to suppress the State's wiretap evidence against him, contending, among other things, that the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Gelbard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. ChavezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. Arthur TortorelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. Baez-LopezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API