Crown, Cork & Seal v. Smith
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtC. Johnson, J.
¶1 This case asks the court to determine what constitutes a “previous bodily disability” entitling an employer to second injury fund coverage under RCW 51.16.120(1) of the Industrial Insurance Act. Division Two of the Court of Appeals held that Crown, Cork & Seal (Crown) was not entitled to second injury fund coverage because any injury to the employee did not substantially impact the employee’s daily functioning and efficiency. We affirm.
FACTS
¶2 In 1980, Sylvia Smith began employment with Crown, a manufacturer of beer and soda cans. Smith worked as a *870bagger, a job requiring her to push a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Ruse v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Stuckey v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Stuckey v. Dept. of Labor & Indus.Washington Supreme Court · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- CROWN, CORK & SEAL v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Boeing Co. v. DossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Boeing Co. v. DossWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- Department of Labor & Industries v. Blanca OrtizCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Boeing Co. v. Dep't of Labor & Indus.Washington Supreme Court · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.