Ridenour v. Equity Supply Co.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison
In this case we are asked to review an order granting workers’ compensation benefits to respondent, Darel R. Ridenour. Appellants claim that benefits should have been awarded under the Occupational Disease Act rather than the Workers’ Compensation Act. We find that benefits were properly awarded, therefore we affirm.
Claimant had worked for Equity Supply Company for about twelve years. He worked primarily within the fertilizer department, but he also worked as a handyman. Claimant had smoked cigarettes since 1944. Smoking, combined with twelve years of work in a dusty environment had resulted…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gaffney v. Industrial Accident Board of MontanaMontana Supreme Court · 1955
- Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. FultonMontana Supreme Court · 1962
- Viets v. Sweet Grass CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1978
- Wight v. Hughes Livestock Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
- La Forest v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Eastman v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1989
- Wassberg v. Anaconda Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1985
- Poppleton v. Rollins, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1987
- Bremer v. BuerkleMontana Supreme Court · 1986
- Chagnon v. TILLEMAN INSURANCE CO.Montana Supreme Court · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.