Bremer v. Buerkle
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber
Edwin Bremer suffered from allergic contact dermatitis which caused him to be disabled forcing him to quit his job as a body shop repairman. The Workers’ Compensation Court held that Mr. Bremer’s allergy was both an injury and a disease and therefore Mr. Bremer was entitled to elect his remedy under either the Workers’ Compensation Act or the Occupational Disease Act. We affirm.
The only issue in this case is, did Edwin Bremer’s allergy constitute an injury within the meaning of the Workers' Compensation Act, as well as an occupational disease within the meaning of the Occupational Disease…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ridenour v. Equity Supply Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1983
- Hoehne v. Granite Lumber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1980
- Wise v. PerkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1983
- Greger v. United Prestress, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1979
- McMahon v. Anaconda Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chagnon v. TILLEMAN INSURANCE CO.Montana Supreme Court · 1993
- Welch v. American Mine Services, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1992
- Daniels v. Kalispell Regional HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1988
- Bodily v. John Jump Trucking, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1991
- Lakey v. Kerrian SMontana Supreme Court · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.