Legal Opinion

Eastman v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1989No. 88-452PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber

The claimant, Paul Eastman, appeals from a final decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court denying him benefits under the Workers’ Compensation Act and affirming a compensation award of $10,000 under the Occupational Disease Act. We affirm.

Mr. Eastman appears pro se and requests this Court to review the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court in two respects. First, we are asked to determine the constitutionality of the Occupational Disease Act, and then to review the sufficiency of the evidence to support the lower court’s determination. We phrase the issues as follows:

1. Does the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Shea v. North-Butte Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Cottrill v. Cottrill Sodding ServiceMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Ridenour v. Equity Supply Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Day v. PayneMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Stratemeyer v. Lincoln CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. CarterMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Wadsworth v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Gulbrandson v. CareyMontana Supreme Court · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API