Legal Opinion
Ackroyd v. Brady Irr. Co.
District Court, D. Montana
Decided February 13, 1939No. 3053PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
PRAY, District Judge.
The complaint in above cause was filed therein pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C.A. 400. In the beginning Brady Irrigation Company, a corporation, was plaintiff, and Winston Brothers Company, a corporation, Teton Cooperative Reservoir Company, a corporation, and Bynum Irrigation District, a public corporation, were defendants. C. K. Malone alleges ownership of ten of the bonds of the Bynum Irrigation District in his complaint in intervention, and James A. Ackroyd and five other persons allege that they are the owners and holders of nine hundred twenty…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smith v. DenniffMontana Supreme Court · 1900
- Gue v. Tide Water Canal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1861
- MacLay v. Missoula Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- Yellowstone Valley Co. v. Associated Mortgage Investors, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
- Lensing v. Day & Hansen Security Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ackroyd v. Winston Bros.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940