Ackroyd v. Winston Bros.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.
Appeals from an order of the District Court of the United States for the District of Montana, Ackroyd v. Brady Irr. Co., D.C, 27 F.Supp. 503, dismissing a c.omplaint and a complaint in intervention seeking' declaratory judgments, 28 U.S.C.A. 400. The appeals were consolidated.
For an understanding of the problems presented to us we narrate the following alleged facts. The right to gather and impound water from a certain run-off in Montana was secured by a private non-profit corporation called -Teton Co-operative Reservoir Company. This company’s corporate structure…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Smith v. DenniffMontana Supreme Court · 1900
- Mayrhofer v. Board of Education of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Van Dyke v. GearySupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Thaanum v. Bynum Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1925
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Storrie Project Water Users Ass'n v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949