Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

City of Fraser v. Almeda University

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 2016No. Docket 323499Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

MURRAY, RJ.

(concurring in part and dissenting in part).

I join the majority’s decision to affirm the trial court’s order denying defendant Almeda University’s motion for summary disposition on the basis of no personal jurisdiction, but dissent from its holding that MCL 390.1603 applies to Almeda. As a result, I would reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand for entry of an order granting summary disposition to Almeda.

The Authentic Credentials in Education Act, MCL 390.1601 et seq., is a short, concise act containing only five sections, with only four substantive sections.1 Section 2, MCL…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Mayor of Lansing v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. HEB Ministries, Inc. v. Texas Higher Education Coordinating BoardTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Detroit Edison Company v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State ex rel Nelson v. Lincoln Medical CollegeNebraska Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API