Legal Opinion

McIver & Chamberlain v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Raney

In each of the above causes an application has been made *43during the present term to a Justice of this court for an order allowing a writ of error. It is not necessary (nor is it proper practice) to have such an order to entitle either an original plaintiff, or a defendant, to a writ of error to a judgment of the Circuit Court in an ordinary civil action at law. A defendant in such an action is entitled to a writ of error as a matter of right, without even paying costs which have accrued up to the time of applying for the writ; but an original plaintiff in the Circuit Court must, to obtain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Davis v. NewmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1888
  2. Tyler v. PainterSupreme Court of Florida · 1877
  3. Simmons v. SprattSupreme Court of Florida · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
  2. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co. v. JohnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
  3. Florida Orange Hedge Fence Co. v. A. G. Branham & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API