Legal Opinion

Florida Orange Hedge Fence Co. v. A. G. Branham & Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Orange count}?-. Motion to dismiss Writ of Error and vacate supersedeas. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Raxey, C. J.:

(irinsfield Taylor and others, partners doing business as the Florida Orange Hedge Fence Company, who were defendants in the Circuit Court, obtained a writ of error to a. judgmant- recovered against them by A. Ci. Branham and E. A. Pearce, partners doing business as A. <1. Branham & Co., and an order was made that the writ, which was returnable to the. present term of this c-ourt, should operate as a supersedeas upon the plaintiffs in error filing a bond with one or more sufficient sureties, as required by law.

A motion is now made by defendants in error to dismiss the writ of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Randon v. BartonTexas Supreme Court · 1849
  2. Lindsay v. PriceTexas Supreme Court · 1870
  3. McIver & Chamberlain v. MarshallSupreme Court of Florida · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spokane & Idaho Lumber Co. v. LoyWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co. v. JohnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
  3. Webster v. WailesSupreme Court of Florida · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API