Legal Opinion
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. New Pulaski Co. Ltd. P'ship
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 8, 1996No. 168, Sept. Term, 1996PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Judge.
On January 5, 1996, the Circuit Court for Baltimore County issued a judgment declaring City of Baltimore Ordinance No. 128 of the 1992 Councilmanic Session preempted by State environmental laws. The court granted summary judgment in favor of appellee The New Pulaski Company Limited Partnership, and the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore appealed.
The principal issue presented for our review is restated as follows:
Whether Ordinance No. 128 is preempted by State environmental laws.
FACTS
The New Pulaski Company Limited Partnership (Pulaski) owns and operates a solid waste incinerator…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Heat & Power Corp. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Beatty v. Trailmaster Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. BalbosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Ad + Soil, Inc. v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Soley v. State Commission on Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. JonesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Maryland Reclamation Associates, Inc. v. Harford CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Hinch v. Lucy Webb Hayes National Training School for DeaconessesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Friends of Ridge v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Days Cove Reclamation Co. v. Queen Anne's CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.