Legal Opinion

Ad + Soil, Inc. v. County Commissioners

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 26, 1986No. 143, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Chief Judge.

Since 1974, the General Assembly has required that any person intending to engage in the “collection, handling, burning, storage, or transportation of sewage sludge” obtain a permit from the State Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. See chapter 680 of the Acts of 1974. 1 Involved in this case is a sewage sludge storage and distribution facility located in Queen Anne’s County. The principal issue is whether, in light of the public general laws of the state governing sewage sludge management and utilization, the county may exercise its local zoning power to regulate the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Schultz v. PrittsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Mayor of Annapolis v. Annapolis Waterfront Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Montgomery County v. BuckmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Fogle v. H & G Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. PEOPLE'S COUNSEL FOR BALTIMORE CTY. v. Loyola CollegeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. People's Counsel v. Maryland Marine Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Talbot County v. SkipperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API