Ohio Valley Pulley Works, Inc. v. Oneida Steel Pulley Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York. Action at law by the Ohio Valley Pulley Works, Incorporated, against the Oneida Steel Pulley Company. Judgment for defendant, and' plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error sued in this action for breach of contract. After an amended complaint was served, a demurrer was interposed, and upon that demurrer a motion for judgment was then made. Judgment was directed for the defendant. A writ of error was then sued out and the case is here, upon assignment of errors, on the claim that the court below erred in holding that the plaintiff in error was not entitled to recover for the breach of contract sued on, and this for the reason that the complaint did not state sufficient facts to constitute a cause of action.
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. HartwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Kilby Mfg. Co. v. Hinchman-Renton Fire Proofing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Wolff v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
- Cameron Mill & Elevator Co. v. Chas. F. Orthwein's SonsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schnerb v. Holt Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- In re United Cigar Stores Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936