Legal Opinion
In re United Cigar Stores Co. of America
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 6, 1936No. 289PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
As the petition correctly points out, there were three riders not absolutely identical with the one quoted in the opinion. That used in the assignment of the lease which forms the basis of the Lorch claim No. 5286 provided that the instrument was *12not' to operate to merge the term with the reversion. The one relating to the claim of Isidor A. and Flora L. Rubel and that relating to the claim of Livingston, Nos. 5312 and 5406 respectively, were not expressly limited to the modification of the general release contained in article 5, but their effect applies to each entire agreement; that is to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Manhattan Properties, Inc. v. Irving Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Bijur Motor Lighting Co. v. Eclipse Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Hunt v. Triplex Safety Glass Co. of North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- C. H. Pope & Co. v. Bibb Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Ohio Valley Pulley Works, Inc. v. Oneida Steel Pulley Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
3Cited by2 opinions
- Holzer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
- In re United Cigar Stores Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937