Legal Opinion

Kerkela v. Benefit Assn. of Railway Employees

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 18, 1935No. 30,193PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stone, Justice.

Action on accident and health insurance policy. After verdict for plaintiff, as for temporary total disability, defendant appeals from the order denying its alternative motion for judgment notAvith-standing or a new trial.

April o, 1932, plaintiff, Avhile employed by a constructing contractor, A. Guthrie & Company, as foreman, fell from a scaffold and suffered injury. He remained on the job until quitting time but did not work thq tAvo folloAving days, the sixth and seventh. He returned on the eighth and thereafter reported every day, including Sundays, for 56 consecutive days.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lobdill v. Laboring Men's Mutual Aid Ass'n of ChatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  2. Wilson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Jones v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lorentz v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. Fine v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API