Legal Opinion
Grimsley v. South Carolina Law Enforcement Division
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided January 3, 2012No. 27085PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kittredge
This is an appeal from the trial court’s order granting the State’s motion to dismiss. We reverse and remand.
Appellants are rehired employees of the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED). Appellants’ claims arise from the contention that SLED has imposed a requirement in a statutorily authorized retirement program that is contrary to law. The trial court dismissed the complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies under the South Carolina Retirement Contribution Procedures Act (Retirement Act), which Appellants challenge on appeal. Appellants additionally appeal the trial…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. HorowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dawkins v. Union Hospital DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Skywaves I Corp. v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- S.C. Elec. v. RandallDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2018
- Crouch Construction Co. v. CauseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Grimsley v. South Carolina Law Enforcement DivisionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.