Legal Opinion

Day v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 1974No. 9626PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TITUS, Judge.

Carlos E. Day pleaded guilty April 16, 1973, to unlawfully possessing lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and made “oral application for probation or parole.” When Day appeared June 12, 1973, for allocution and sentencing, the application for probation was withdrawn and he was sentenced to imprisonment for 5 years. Ch. 195 RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S., Amended L.1971. On August 13, 1973, Day filed a Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R., motion to vacate the sentence on two grounds, videlicet: “(a) Movant’s guilty plea . . . was involuntarily made in that Movant was induced and misled by counsel into…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Griffith v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Babcock v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  3. Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  4. Crego v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  5. Hendrix v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Abrams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Garrett v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Jackson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Allen v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Slankard v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API