Legal Opinion
Matter of Paternity of Humphrey
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1991No. 45S03-9112-CV-1005PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
583 N.E.2d 133 (1991)
In the matter of the Paternity of Justin Lavel Humphrey.
Joseph Humphrey, Appellant (Respondent below),
v.
ANNETTE WOODS, Appellee (Petitioner below).
No. 45S03-9112-CV-1005.
Supreme Court of Indiana.
December 20, 1991.
David Paul Allen, Hammond, for appellant.
Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen., and Gary Damon Secrest, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for appellee.
ON PETITION TO TRANSFER
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
Did the trial court err in ordering appellant Joseph Humphrey to pay the presumptive amount of child support called for by our state's guidelines? The Court of Appeals answered…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Treschman v. TreschmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
- Pilgrim v. PilgrimIndiana Court of Appeals · 1947
- Grossman v. LauberIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
- Humphrey v. WoodsIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pettit v. PettitIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- McGinley-Ellis v. EllisIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Carr v. CarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Brady v. JancaricIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- John A. Schmidt v. Karen Elaine Schmidt DentonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.