Legal Opinion

Grossman v. Lauber

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1868PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from the Ripley Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtFrazer, J.

This was a suit to i’ecover for the use and occupation of lands, and for the value of a building, and timber trees removed therefrom. The answer was in seven paragraphs. 1. General denial. 2. As to the use and occupation ; that the premises were used and occupied by one Mary Grossman, mother of the plaintiff's, who was a tenant in common with the plaintiffs, owning one-third of thé premises for life; that said Mary leased the premises to the defendant, and that he had fully paid the rents to her. 3. As a defense to the whole complaint, that said Mary Gross-man was a tenant in common, owning…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pease v. HowardNew York Supreme Court · 1817

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Treschman v. TreschmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Grubb v. SterrettDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1970
  3. Price v. SandersIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Bronnenberg v. Indiana Union Traction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Turner v. FlaggIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API