Grossman v. Lauber
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Ripley Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtFrazer, J.
This was a suit to i’ecover for the use and occupation of lands, and for the value of a building, and timber trees removed therefrom. The answer was in seven paragraphs. 1. General denial. 2. As to the use and occupation ; that the premises were used and occupied by one Mary Grossman, mother of the plaintiff's, who was a tenant in common with the plaintiffs, owning one-third of thé premises for life; that said Mary leased the premises to the defendant, and that he had fully paid the rents to her. 3. As a defense to the whole complaint, that said Mary Gross-man was a tenant in common, owning…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pease v. HowardNew York Supreme Court · 1817
3Cited by11 opinions
- Treschman v. TreschmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
- Grubb v. SterrettDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1970
- Price v. SandersIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Bronnenberg v. Indiana Union Traction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Turner v. FlaggIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.