John A. Schmidt v. Karen Elaine Schmidt Denton
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: PRISCILLA BEAULIEU PELGEN STEVEN K. RAQUET The Law Office of Priscilla Pelgen DERICK W. STEELE Kokomo, Indiana Kokomo, Indiana May 08 2013, 9:33 am IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA JOHN A. SCHMIDT, ) ) Appellant-Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) No. 34A02-1207-DR-579 ) KAREN ELAINE SCHMIDT DENTON, ) ) Appellee-Respondent.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Quillen v. QuillenIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Menard, Inc. v. Dage-MTI, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Jay Myoung Yoon v. Sunsook YoonIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Clark v. CroweIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Stultz v. StultzIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.