Legal Opinion
Cole v. Goldberger, Pedersen & Hochron
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 12, 1978PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert E. Fischer, J.
These separate special proceedings seeking declaratory and injunctive relief — consolidated for purposes of this decision— assert the invalidity of various postjudgment procedures provided by CPLR article 52 as violative of due process guarantees of the Federal and State Constitutions. The Attorney-General has been served in compliance with CPLR 1012 (subd [b]), but has not appeared.
The underlying facts in each proceeding are undisputed. In Cole, the respondent law firm, Goldberger, Pedersen & Hochron, representing a physician, obtained and entered a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Deary v. Guardian Loan Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Cynthia McCahey v. L.P. Investors, Allen M. Rosenthal, Affiliated Credit Adjusters, Sheriff of Suffolk County, Suffolk County ClerkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Clay v. Edward J. Fisher, Jr., M.D., Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1984
- Cordius Trust v. KUMMERFELD ASSOCIATES, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Reigh v. SchleighDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.