Paiko v. Boeynaems
Hawaii Supreme Court
Submission Upon Agreed Statement oe Facts.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE JUSTICES BT
ROBERTSON, C.J.
The agreed statement of facts in this case sets forth that one Manuel Paiko died testate in Honolulu on the first day of April, 1890, leaving surviving him his widow, Domitila K. Paiko, and his son Joseph Paiko and grandson Joseph Paiko, junior, the plaintiffs herein; that Domitila K. Paiko died on October 23, 1906; that the said Joseph Paiko has never had a' lawful child other than the said Joseph Paiko, junior, and the said Joseph Paiko, junior, has never had a lawful child; that Manuel Paiko’s will was duly admitted to probate, the estate has been…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Head v. FordyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Will of EhlersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Waring v. Bosher's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- Hurst v. WeaverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Ball v. WoolfolkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bishop v. MahikoHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
- Lidgate v. DanfordHawaii Supreme Court · 1916
- In Re the Estate of DeeringHawaii Supreme Court · 1927
- In Re the Trust Estate Created by WeillHawaii Supreme Court · 1965
- Bertelmann v. LucasHawaii Supreme Court · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.