Legal Opinion

People v. Tannenbaum

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 1968PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. Upon reargument, the judgment appealed from should be reversed and the information dismissed. Defendant was convicted of violating section 484-i of the former Penal Law, and his conviction was sustained by this court (18 N Y 2d 268). On direct appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States, his appeal was dismissed as moot (388 U. S. 439). In Rabeck v. New York (391 U. S. 462), the Supreme Court held section 484-i to be unconstitutional on its face. In light of that decision, we granted defendant’s motion for reargument (22 N Y 2d 972). There is no question that Rabeck v. New…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Fuller v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Rabeck v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. EdreesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. United States v. KellyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1970
  3. People v. CesaireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. People v. BroadnaxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  5. People v. Brodeur (Christopher)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API