Rabeck v. New York
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
Appellant, in seeking reversal of his conviction for selling “girlie” magazines to a minor under 18 years of age in violation of former § 484-i, New York Penal Law,* argues among other grounds that the statute is impermissibly vague. We agree. While we rejected a like claim as to § 484 — h in Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U. S. 629, § 484-i in part prohibited the sale of “any . . . magazines . . . which would appeal to the lust of persons under the age of eighteen years or to their curiosity as to sex or to the anatomical differences between the sexes . . . .” That standard in our view is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ginsberg v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
3Cited by23 opinions
- Erznoznik v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- M.S. News Co. v. CasadoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Mandel v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- United States v. Stewart Hymans and Mark PaynterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- American Booksellers Ass'n v. McAuliffeDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.