Legal Opinion

Grange Mutual Insurance Co. v. Trude

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 2004No. 2003-SC-0772-MRPublishedCited by 168 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLER, Justice.

I. Introduction

The trial court ordered Grange Mutual Insurance Company (“Grange”) to comply with sixteen discovery requests. Grange petitioned the Court of Appeals for a writ of prohibition, claiming that compliance with the trial court’s order required burdensome production of irrelevant information and disclosure of privileged trade se crets. The Court of Appeals found that Grange failed to prove that production of the ordered discovery would result in irreparable harm and refused to grant the writ. With regard to the relevance, we find that the discovery requests are…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Bender v. EatonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  5. Maddox v. GraumanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by168 opinions

  1. Cox v. BradenKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Collins v. BradenKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc. v. ColemanKentucky Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Caldwell v. ChauvinKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Buckley v. WilsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2005

163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API