Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Edwards v. Query

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 28, 1946No. 15806PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Associate Justice Stukes

delivered the majority Opinion of the Court.

Perhaps the best way to approach the problem presented by this case is to first examine the former so-called gasoline tax diversion suits (State ex rel. Fdwards v. Osborne, 193 S. C., 158, 7 S. E. (2d), 526, and idem., 195 S. C., 295, 11 S. E. (2d), 260) for they involved vitally different facts and are not at all controlling of the instant issues. They were concerned with legislative attempts to' divert large amounts of the proceeds of the gasoline tax to purposes foreign to its levy, in fact, to meet deficits in state…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Davis v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Weaver v. Palmer Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Hicklin v. ConeySupreme Court of the United States · 1933

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Richards v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  2. State Ex Rel. Roddey v. BYRNES, GOVERNORSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  3. Bynum v. BarronSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  4. Casey v. South Carolina State Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  5. Casey v. South Carolina State Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API