Legal Opinion

Oakland Hills Development Corp. v. Lueders Drainage District

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 21, 1995No. Docket 167306PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right the trial court’s granting of defendants’ motion for a directed verdict. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

This case involves negotiations with respect to an eighty-three-acre parcel of property located in Rochester Hills. Although the facts are rather lengthy and complicated, the parties stipulated certain facts, which were made a part of the final pretrial order. Approximately thirty-nine acres of the property are uplands suitable for construction, while the remaining forty-four acres are wetland. Plaintiffs predecessor in interest in the property was WX22,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cardinal Mooney High School v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In Re Widening of Bagley AvenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Borden, Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Batty v. SnookMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  5. IMLAY TWP. PRIMARY SCH. DIST. v. State Bd. of Edn.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Head v. Phillips Camper Sales & Rental, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Omnicom of Michigan v. Giannetti Investment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Leavitt v. Monaco Coach Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. K & K Construction, Inc v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Schroeder v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API