Legal Opinion

Borden, Inc v. Department of Treasury

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1974No. 2 September Term 1973, Docket No. 54,419PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

(for affirmance). When, following receipt of the annual report of a corporation, the Franchise Fee Division "computes” the franchise fee of the corporation, it exhausts its authority under the statute. The Division is not authorized to re-compute the fee if it subsequently obtains what it regards as more accurate information.

The Division (or its predecessor, the Michigan Corporation and Securities Commission) stamped on Borden’s reports for each of the years 1964-1968 the date "filed” and the date "accepted”. On each report there appears the "Tentative computation of fee by Corporation” and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Dodge BrothersMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. McLouth Steel Corp. v. Corporation & Securities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  3. In Re Appeal of Hoskins Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. In Re MacDonald EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Rockwell v. Crestwood School District Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. City of Detroit v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. International Business MacHines Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Armco Steel Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  5. AM. FEDERATION OF STATE, CTY. & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES COUNCIL NO 23 v. Recorder's Court JudgesMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API